A collaboratively-derived research agenda for e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics

George Kinnear; Ian Jones; Chris Sangwin; Maryam Alarfaj; Ben Davies; Sam Fearn; Colin Foster; André Heck; Karen Henderson; Tim Hunt; Paola Iannone; Igor’ Kontorovich; Niclas Larson; Tim Lowe; John Meyer; Ann O’Shea; Peter Rowlett; Indunil Sikurajapathi; Thomas Wong

doi:10.1007/s40753-022-00189-6

A collaboratively-derived research agenda for e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics

George Kinnear^*, Ian Jones, Chris Sangwin, Maryam Alarfaj, Ben Davies, Sam Fearn, Colin Foster, André Heck, Karen Henderson, Tim Hunt, Paola Iannone, Igor’ Kontorovich, Niclas Larson, Tim Lowe, John Meyer, Ann O’Shea, Peter Rowlett, Indunil Sikurajapathi, Thomas Wong

^*Corresponding author for this work

Mathematics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

65 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper describes the collaborative development of an agenda for research on e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics. We built on an established approach to develop the agenda from the contributions of 22 mathematics education researchers, university teachers and learning technologists interested in this topic. The resulting set of 55 research questions are grouped into 5 broad themes: errors and feedback, student interactions with e-assessment, design and implementation choices, affordances offered by e-assessment tools, and mathematical skills. This agenda gives a framework for a programme of research aligned with practical concerns that will contribute to both theoretical and practical development.

Original language	English
Number of pages	31
Journal	International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
Early online date	12 Sept 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00189-6
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 12 Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Keywords

Assessment
Delphi method
Feedback
Mathematics education
Online Learning
Delphi methods
Online learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Education
General Mathematics
Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1007/s40753-022-00189-6Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)

KinnearG2022collaborativelyFinal published version, 943 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)

Cite this

Kinnear, G., Jones, I., Sangwin, C., Alarfaj, M., Davies, B., Fearn, S., Foster, C., Heck, A., Henderson, K., Hunt, T., Iannone, P., Kontorovich, I., Larson, N., Lowe, T., Meyer, J., O’Shea, A., Rowlett, P., Sikurajapathi, I., & Wong, T. (2022). A collaboratively-derived research agenda for e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00189-6

@article{fd8c46f8ccc84ff7bf2ebed142ff405b,

title = "A collaboratively-derived research agenda for e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics",

abstract = "This paper describes the collaborative development of an agenda for research on e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics. We built on an established approach to develop the agenda from the contributions of 22 mathematics education researchers, university teachers and learning technologists interested in this topic. The resulting set of 55 research questions are grouped into 5 broad themes: errors and feedback, student interactions with e-assessment, design and implementation choices, affordances offered by e-assessment tools, and mathematical skills. This agenda gives a framework for a programme of research aligned with practical concerns that will contribute to both theoretical and practical development.",

keywords = "Assessment, Delphi method, Feedback, Mathematics education, Online Learning, Delphi methods, Online learning",

author = "George Kinnear and Ian Jones and Chris Sangwin and Maryam Alarfaj and Ben Davies and Sam Fearn and Colin Foster and Andr{\'e} Heck and Karen Henderson and Tim Hunt and Paola Iannone and Igor{\textquoteright} Kontorovich and Niclas Larson and Tim Lowe and John Meyer and Ann O{\textquoteright}Shea and Peter Rowlett and Indunil Sikurajapathi and Thomas Wong",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s).",

year = "2022",

month = sep,

day = "12",

doi = "10.1007/s40753-022-00189-6",

language = "English",

journal = "International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education",

issn = "2198-9745",

publisher = "Springer",

}

Kinnear, G, Jones, I, Sangwin, C, Alarfaj, M, Davies, B, Fearn, S, Foster, C, Heck, A, Henderson, K, Hunt, T, Iannone, P, Kontorovich, I, Larson, N, Lowe, T, Meyer, J, O’Shea, A, Rowlett, P, Sikurajapathi, I & Wong, T 2022, 'A collaboratively-derived research agenda for e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics', International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00189-6

TY - JOUR

T1 - A collaboratively-derived research agenda for e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics

AU - Kinnear, George

AU - Jones, Ian

AU - Sangwin, Chris

AU - Alarfaj, Maryam

AU - Davies, Ben

AU - Fearn, Sam

AU - Foster, Colin

AU - Heck, André

AU - Henderson, Karen

AU - Hunt, Tim

AU - Iannone, Paola

AU - Kontorovich, Igor’

AU - Larson, Niclas

AU - Lowe, Tim

AU - Meyer, John

AU - O’Shea, Ann

AU - Rowlett, Peter

AU - Sikurajapathi, Indunil

AU - Wong, Thomas

PY - 2022/9/12

Y1 - 2022/9/12

N2 - This paper describes the collaborative development of an agenda for research on e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics. We built on an established approach to develop the agenda from the contributions of 22 mathematics education researchers, university teachers and learning technologists interested in this topic. The resulting set of 55 research questions are grouped into 5 broad themes: errors and feedback, student interactions with e-assessment, design and implementation choices, affordances offered by e-assessment tools, and mathematical skills. This agenda gives a framework for a programme of research aligned with practical concerns that will contribute to both theoretical and practical development.

AB - This paper describes the collaborative development of an agenda for research on e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics. We built on an established approach to develop the agenda from the contributions of 22 mathematics education researchers, university teachers and learning technologists interested in this topic. The resulting set of 55 research questions are grouped into 5 broad themes: errors and feedback, student interactions with e-assessment, design and implementation choices, affordances offered by e-assessment tools, and mathematical skills. This agenda gives a framework for a programme of research aligned with practical concerns that will contribute to both theoretical and practical development.

KW - Assessment

KW - Delphi method

KW - Feedback

KW - Mathematics education

KW - Online Learning

KW - Delphi methods

KW - Online learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137928219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40753-022-00189-6

DO - 10.1007/s40753-022-00189-6

M3 - Article

SN - 2198-9745

JO - International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education

JF - International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education

ER -

A collaboratively-derived research agenda for e-assessment in undergraduate mathematics

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this