Sociotechnical imaginaries in the present and future university: a corpus-assisted discourse analysis of UK higher education texts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

269 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Technology has dominated discourse on the future university and how digital technologies disrupting wider societal activities can be leveraged in higher education. To gain an insight into UK institutional perspective on technology adoption in teaching and learning and visions for the future, two corpora of text are analysed: Teaching Excellence Framework statements (n = 88) and university strategy documents (n = 88), totalling 1, 129, 736 words. Quantitative empirical analysis reveals that institutions write about how they ‘use’ technology for teaching and learning. Interpretative analysis found that technology is ‘used’ as an end in itself as well as a means for specific ends (such as assessment and feedback and flexible learning). Using concepts from science and technology studies and philosophy of technology, these perspectives are theorised as instrumentalist, substantivist and essentialist and problematised when viewing technology in education as apolitical, neutral and inevitable. Perceived neutrality ignores the many competing ideologies and interests at play. In this context, a dichotomy of ‘pedagogy first’ or ‘technology-led’ design is explored. Critical theory of technology is used to bridge these binary discourses which are described as reductive in a complex sociotechnical university assemblage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-217
Number of pages14
JournalLearning, Media and Technology
Volume46
Issue number2
Early online date23 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • Corpus
  • discourse
  • university
  • technology
  • instrumentalism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sociotechnical imaginaries in the present and future university: a corpus-assisted discourse analysis of UK higher education texts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this