Abstract
The presence of financial constraints changes traditional auction theory predictions. In the case of multiple items, such constraints may affect revenue equivalence and efficiency of different auction formats. We consider a simple complete information setting with three financially constrained bidders and two items that have different values common to all the bidders. Using a laboratory experiment, we find that, as predicted by theory, it is more beneficial for the seller to sell the higher value item first. We then show that the first-price sealed-bid auction yields higher revenue than the English auction, with significant differences in learning of equilibrium strategies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Experimental Economics |
Early online date | 10 Oct 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 10 Oct 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Acknowledgements:The authors would like to thank Paul J. Healy, John Kagel, Ian Krajbich, Dan Levin, Ernst Fehr, Alexander Ritschel, Caitlyn Trevor, andmembers of the OSU Theory/Experimental group for their helpful comments and conversations. This study was supported by OSU Decision Sciences Collaborative and Journal of Money, Credit and Banking research grants. All subjects provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the OSU IRB.
Keywords
- Auction
- Budget constraints
- English auction
- First price auction
- Experiment