Whose karate? Language and cultural learning in a multilingual karate club in London

Hua Zhu*, Wei Li, Daria Jankowicz-Pytel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
151 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explores language learning as a process of translanguaging and of cultural translation. We draw examples from a sociolinguistic ethnography of translanguaging practices in a karate club in east London, UK. Formulaic Japanese is taught as part of karate techniques, practised as the language of performance and rituals and valued as the key indicator of karate expertise over other languages. Key karate verbal routines such as osu and kiai, while linguistically difficult to translate, bespeak core karate values such as respect and confidence, and equally important, the embodiment of these verbal routines is well integrated into karate moves, breaking down the dichotomy of verbal and physical dimensions of the interaction. The predominant use of formulaic Japanese in rituals, along with other semiotic resources, creates an imagined karate world characterized by hierarchy and guarded through the value of respect. In examining whose karate and how cultural traditions, values and practices are translated and why, we broaden the concept of language and regard it as a multifaceted sense- and meaning-making resource and explore the theoretical implications of taking language teaching and learning as a process of cultural translation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-83
Number of pages32
JournalApplied Linguistics
Volume41
Issue number1
Early online date10 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

Keywords

  • Translanguaging
  • Karate
  • language and culture learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Whose karate? Language and cultural learning in a multilingual karate club in London'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this