Environmental crises at the Permian–Triassic mass extinction

Jacopo Dal Corso, Haijun Song, Sara Callegaro, Daoliang Chu, Yadong Sun, Jason Hilton, Steve Grasby, Michael Joachimski, Paul Wignall

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

451 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The link between the Permian–Triassic mass extinction (252 million years ago) and the emplacement of the Siberian Traps Large Igneous Province (STLIP) was first proposed in the 1990s. However, the complex cascade of volcanically driven environmental and biological events that led to the largest known extinction remains challenging to reconstruct. In this Review, we critically evaluate the geological evidence and discuss the current hypotheses surrounding the kill mechanisms of the Permian–Triassic mass extinction. The initial extrusive and pyroclastic phase of STLIP volcanism was coeval with a widespread crisis of terrestrial biota and increased stress on marine animal species at high northern latitudes. The terrestrial ecological disturbance probably started 60–370 thousand years before that in the ocean, indicating different response times of terrestrial and marine ecosystems to the Siberian Traps eruptions, and was related to increased seasonality, ozone depletion and acid rain, the effects of which could have lasted more than 1 million years. The mainly intrusive STLIP phase that followed is linked with the final collapse of terrestrial ecosystems and the rapid (around 60 thousand years) extinction of 81–94% of marine species, potentially related to a combination of global warming, anoxia and ocean acidification. Nevertheless, the ultimate reasons for the exceptional severity of the Permian–Triassic mass extinction remain debated. Improved geochronology (especially of terrestrial records and STLIP products), tighter ecological constraints and higher-resolution Earth system modelling are needed to resolve the causal relations between volcanism, environmental perturbations and the patterns of ecosystem collapse.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197–214
Number of pages18
JournalNature Reviews Earth & Environment
Volume3
Issue number3
Early online date22 Feb 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors thank S. Greene (University of Birmingham) for useful discussions on Earth system modelling. J.D.C., H.S. and D.C. acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42172031, 92155201, 41821001, 42072025). J.D.C., H.S., D.C., J.H. and P.B.W. acknowledge “Ecosystem resilience and recovery from the Permo-Triassic crisis” project (EcoPT; grant NE/P013724/1), which is a part of the Biosphere Evolution, Transitions and Resilience (BETR) Program. S.C. acknowledges support from the Research Council of Norway (grant 301096 MAPLES, Young Research Talents). M.M.J. and Y.S. acknowledge support from the German Science Foundation (grant JO 219/16 within DFG Research Unit TERSANE/FOR 2332).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Springer Nature Limited.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Pollution
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Atmospheric Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental crises at the Permian–Triassic mass extinction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this