Building forests for the future

A. Robert MacKenzie, Sami Ullah, Christine H. Foyer*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

74 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many governments have set ambitious targets for tree planting and increased woodland cover as a key part of actions to reach net‐zero carbon emissions by 2050. However, many uncertainties remain concerning how and where to expand tree cover, what species to plant, and how best to manage new plantations. Much contemporary forestry has been based on even‐aged monocultures, largely because of perceived advantages for timber production. However, in order to play a key role in climate change mitigation future forests will have to achieve timber production (and wider ecosystem service provision) alongside resilience to biotic and abiotic challenge. It is therefore crucial that appropriate informed decisions are made with regard to the structure, composition, and planning of future forests, in order to provide sustainable solutions that provide environmental, economic, and health benefits to society. Genetically diverse, mixed, and irregular forests, with their higher biodiversity and niche complementarity, are promising new forest configurations for regulating the water cycle, storing carbon, and delivering other goods and services. In the following discussion, we have used UK information to illustrate the benefits of mixed woodland versus monocultures and highlighted current issues related to government initiatives and policies for current and future forests. However, similar issues and problems are encountered globally.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere518
Number of pages9
JournalFood and Energy Security
Volume13
Issue number2
Early online date6 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Birmingham Institute for Forest Research (BIFoR) gratefully acknowledges support from the JABBS Foundation, the University of Birmingham, the Wolfson Foundation, the Leverhulme Trust, the John Horseman Trust, the Woodland Trust, and the Ecological Continuity Trust. The authors would like to extend thanks to the Technical Team at BIFoR FACE who maintains and operates the experimental forest infrastructure of BIFoR in Staffordshire for research work. ARMK and SU acknowledge support from the UK Natural Environment Research Council through grants NE/S015833/1 and NE/T000449/1, respectively.

Keywords

  • continuous cover forestry
  • mixed planting
  • forest genetic resource
  • elevated CO2

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Building forests for the future'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this