Recommendations for reporting equivalent black carbon (eBC) mass concentrations based on long-term pan-European in-situ observations

Marjan Savadkoohi*, Marco Pandolfi*, Olivier Favez, Jean Philippe Putaud, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Markus Fiebig, Philip K. Hopke, Paolo Laj, Alfred Wiedensohler, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, Susanne Bastian, Benjamin Chazeau, Álvaro Clemente María, Cristina Colombi, Francesca Costabile, David C. Green, Christoph Hueglin, Eleni Liakakou, Krista Luoma, Stefano ListraniNikos Mihalopoulos, Nicolas Marchand, Griša Močnik, Jarkko V. Niemi, Jakub Ondráček, Jean Eudes Petit, Oliver V. Rattigan, Cristina Reche, Hilkka Timonen, Gloria Titos, Anja H. Tremper, Stergios Vratolis, Petr Vodička, Eduardo Yubero Funes, Naděžda Zíková, Roy M. Harrison, Tuukka Petäjä, Andrés Alastuey, Xavier Querol

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A reliable determination of equivalent black carbon (eBC) mass concentrations derived from filter absorption photometers (FAPs) measurements depends on the appropriate quantification of the mass absorption cross-section (MAC) for converting the absorption coefficient (babs) to eBC. This study investigates the spatial–temporal variability of the MAC obtained from simultaneous elemental carbon (EC) and babs measurements performed at 22 sites. We compared different methodologies for retrieving eBC integrating different options for calculating MAC including: locally derived, median value calculated from 22 sites, and site-specific rolling MAC. The eBC concentrations that underwent correction using these methods were identified as LeBC (local MAC), MeBC (median MAC), and ReBC (Rolling MAC) respectively. Pronounced differences (up to more than 50 %) were observed between eBC as directly provided by FAPs (NeBC; Nominal instrumental MAC) and ReBC due to the differences observed between the experimental and nominal MAC values. The median MAC was 7.8 ± 3.4 m2 g-1 from 12 aethalometers at 880 nm, and 10.6 ± 4.7 m2 g-1 from 10 MAAPs at 637 nm. The experimental MAC showed significant site and seasonal dependencies, with heterogeneous patterns between summer and winter in different regions. In addition, long-term trend analysis revealed statistically significant (s.s.) decreasing trends in EC. Interestingly, we showed that the corresponding corrected eBC trends are not independent of the way eBC is calculated due to the variability of MAC. NeBC and EC decreasing trends were consistent at sites with no significant trend in experimental MAC. Conversely, where MAC showed s.s. trend, the NeBC and EC trends were not consistent while ReBC concentration followed the same pattern as EC. These results underscore the importance of accounting for MAC variations when deriving eBC measurements from FAPs and emphasize the necessity of incorporating EC observations to constrain the uncertainty associated with eBC.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108553
Number of pages17
JournalEnvironment international
Volume185
Early online date2 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was funded and supported within the framework of the Research Infrastructures Services Reinforcing AQ Monitoring Capacities in European Urban & Industrial AreaS (RI-URBANS) project. The RI-URBANS project (https://riurbans.eu/, contract 101036245), is a European H2020-Green Deal initiative that aims to provide comprehensive tools for the measurement and analysis of advanced AQ parameters (RI-URBANS, 2020). These parameters include eBC, ultrafine particles, and oxidative potential in urban environments, which will consequently allow for the enhanced assessment of AQ policies. RI-URBANS is implementing the ACTRIS (https://www.actris.eu/) strategy for the development of services for improving air quality in Europe. The authors would like to also thank the support from “Agencia Estatal de Investigación” from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under the project CAIAC (PID2019-108990RB-I00), AIRPHONEMA (PID2022-142160OB-I00), and the Generalitat de Catalunya (AGAUR, SGR-447). M. Savadkoohi would like to thank the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for her FPI grant (PRE-2020-095498). This study is also partly funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, a partnership between UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) and Imperial College London, and the UK Natural Environment Research Council. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, UKHSA or the Department of Health and Social Care. The work in Helsinki and Hyytiälä is supported by Academy of Finland flagship “Atmosphere and Climate Competence Center (ACCC), project numbers 337549, 337552, 334792, 328616, 345510 and the Technology Industries of Finland Centennial Foundation Urban Air Quality 2.0 project and European Commission via FOCI-project (grant number 101056783). The work performed in Rome (IT) was supported by ARPA Lazio, the regional Environmental Protection Agency. Measurements at Granada urban station were possible thanks to MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and NextGenerationEU/PRTR under the projects PID2020-120015RB-I00 and PID2021-128757OB-I00, ACTRIS-España (CGL2017-90884REDT), and University of Granada Plan Propio through Excellence Research Unit Earth Science and Singular Laboratory AGORA (LS2022-1). Partial support of this work by the project “PANhellenic infrastructure for Atmospheric Composition and climatE change” (MIS 5021516) which is implemented under the Action “Reinforcement of the Research and Innovation Infrastructure”, funded by the Operational Programme “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014-2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund). Partial funding was obtained by Slovenian ARRS/ARIS program P1-0385. Partial support for operating stations in France is received by ACTRIS-FR supported by French Ministery for research and Education and by France2030 initiative under project ANR-21-ESRE-0013. Elche data were possible thanks to the support of European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR” (CAMBIO project, ref. TED2021-131336B-I00) and by the Valencian Regional Government (Generalitat Valenciana, CIAICO/2021/280 research project). This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic within the Large Research Infrastructure Support Project - ACTRIS Participation of the Czech Republic (ACTRIS-CZ LM2023030).

Funding Information:
This work was funded and supported within the framework of the Research Infrastructures Services Reinforcing AQ Monitoring Capacities in European Urban & Industrial AreaS (RI-URBANS) project. The RI-URBANS project ( https://riurbans.eu/ , contract 101036245), is a European H2020-Green Deal initiative that aims to provide comprehensive tools for the measurement and analysis of advanced AQ parameters ( RI-URBANS, 2020 ). These parameters include eBC, ultrafine particles, and oxidative potential in urban environments, which will consequently allow for the enhanced assessment of AQ policies. RI-URBANS is implementing the ACTRIS ( https://www.actris.eu/ ) strategy for the development of services for improving air quality in Europe.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)

Keywords

  • Absorption
  • eBC
  • EC
  • FAPs
  • MAC
  • Rolling MAC
  • Site specific MAC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Environmental Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recommendations for reporting equivalent black carbon (eBC) mass concentrations based on long-term pan-European in-situ observations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this