Comparison‐specific preferences: The attentional dilution effect for delay and risk

Daniel Read*, Rebecca McDonald, Robin Cubitt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In cross‐modal decisions, the options differ on many attributes, and in uni‐modal decisions, they differ on few. We supply new theory and data to understand how discounting for both delay and risk differs between cross‐modal and uni‐modal decisions. We propose the attentional dilution effect in decision making in which (a) allocation of limited attention to an attribute determines that attribute's decision weight and (b) the attention an attribute receives is increasing in the difference between options on that attribute and decreasing in the number of other attributes that differ between options. We introduce the random order delayed compensation method and conduct two experiments focusing on delayed and risky receipt of consumer goods. Consistent with the attentional dilution effect, we find that in this domain, patience and risk tolerance are generally higher in cross‐modal than uni‐modal decisions. We suggest that, since many real‐world choices are cross‐modal, people may be more patient and risk‐tolerant in their everyday life than is suggested by standard lab experiments.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2348
JournalJournal of Behavioral Decision Making
Early online date17 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Aug 2023

Keywords

  • attention
  • comparison‐specific preferences
  • cross‐modal
  • intertemporal choice
  • risky choice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison‐specific preferences: The attentional dilution effect for delay and risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this