Contesting density: beyond nimby-ism and usual suspects in governing the future city

Jennifer Robinson*, Katia Attuyer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Density is often a major focus of contestation in imagining the future city. The built form of the future city, including its height and density, is a crystallization of current and projected urban growth, as well as a realization of policy ambitions. However, also determinant of future built form are present capacities to extract value from urban development, on the part of both private and public actors. This tight ‘nexus’ of concerns and interests drives the specific heights, densities and public space provision of the future city. This paper considers, on what grounds today’s urban residents might be drawn into a battle for the quality of the future city?.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1294-1301
Number of pages8
JournalUrban Geography
Volume41
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council [ES/N006070/1]. The authors acknowledge funding from the ESRC Urban Transformations Grant (number ES/N006070/1) ‘Governing the future city: a comparative analysis of governance innovations in large-scale urban developments in Shanghai, London, Johannesburg’, with Phil Harrison (University of the Witwatersrand) and Fulong Wu (University College London). We are very grateful for the support we received from Sharon Hayward from the London Tenants’ Federation, our partners in the research project, Robin Brown of Just Space, and members of the Grand Union Alliance and Old Oak Neighbourhood Forum. We thank all interviewees and informants, who generously shared their experiences and challenges with us. We also thank the officers of the OPDC and members of the OPDC planning committee and board for their openness about and insight into their work. Any errors or omissions remain our responsibility.

Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge funding from the ESRC Urban Transformations Grant (number ES/N006070/1) ‘Governing the future city: a comparative analysis of governance innovations in large-scale urban developments in Shanghai, London, Johannesburg’, with Phil Harrison (University of the Witwatersrand) and Fulong Wu (University College London). We are very grateful for the support we received from Sharon Hayward from the London Tenants’ Federation, our partners in the research project, Robin Brown of Just Space, and members of the Grand Union Alliance and Old Oak Neighbourhood Forum. We thank all interviewees and informants, who generously shared their experiences and challenges with us. We also thank the officers of the OPDC and members of the OPDC planning committee and board for their openness about and insight into their work. Any errors or omissions remain our responsibility.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Density
  • London
  • residents associations
  • urban movements
  • viability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Urban Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contesting density: beyond nimby-ism and usual suspects in governing the future city'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this