Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation

Laura Swaithes, Laura Campbell*, Sibyl Anthierens, Magdalena Skrybant, Dieuwke Schiphof, Helen French, Maarten de Wit, Steven Blackburn*, Krysia Dziedzic

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This final article in the four-part series focuses on the often neglected yet important role of the public in implementing research in General Practice and Primary Care more broadly. Experience in implementation of findings from research with public engagement in Primary Care has highlighted how partnership working with patients and the public is important in transitioning from 'what we know' from the evidence-base to 'what we do' in practice. Factors related to Primary Care research that make public engagement important are highlighted e.g. implementing complex interventions, implementing interventions that increase health equity, implementing interventions in countries with different primary healthcare system strengths. Involvement of patients and public can enhance the development of modelling and simulation included in studies on systems modelling for improving health services. We draw on the emerging evidence base to describe public engagement in implementation and offer some guiding principles for engaging with the public in the implementation in General Practice and Primary Care in general. Illustrative case studies are included to support others wishing to offer meaningful engagement in implementing research evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2243037
Number of pages9
JournalThe European Journal of General Practice
Volume29
Issue number1
Early online date23 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Family Practice
  • General Practice
  • Health Equity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Series: Public engagement with research. Part 4: Maximising the benefits of involving the public in research implementation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this