Boosting and broadening recruitment to UK cancer trials: towards a blueprint for action

Veronica Nanton*, Rik Bryan, Ann Pope, Ana Hughes, Kieran Jefferson, James Catto, Allen Knight, Jean Gallagher, Harriet Mintz, Sarah Pirrie, Wenyu Liu, Annie Young, Prashant Patel, Nicholas James

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recruitment and retention in cancer trials are long-standing issues, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The UK National Institute of Health Research and leading clinicians have emphasised the urgency to achieve and surpass prepandemic levels of participation.

Data from a recent UK trial demonstrated the impact of COVID-19 and highlighted factors that limited recruitment. In response to this worldwide problem, studies have identified strategies for remediation at the levels of funding, the research environment, study design and trial team-related aspects, yet evidence of progress is lacking.

Equality, diversity and inclusivity have become central to UK health and social policy during the 2000s. The need for greater inclusivity in trials has become a particular concern for cancer researchers and funders in the UK and in the USA, in recognition of potential bias in results. In the UK trials, the lack of standardised recording of ethnicity data renders interpretation difficult and caution is required in comparisons with the USA.

Recently, the focus of concern has shifted away from the impact of deprivation and low socioeconomic status on trial participation. Barriers created by these factors and their frequent intersection with ethnicity should not be overlooked.

The UK has adopted an advisory approach to broadening recruitment, publishing policy documents, guidance and toolkits. In the USA, by contrast, action on inclusion is increasingly mandated. Within the UK paradigm, the cancer research community is strongly encouraged to adopt a coordinated approach towards standardised digital data collection and embed and evaluate innovative, cocreated, locally relevant strategies.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere000092
Number of pages10
JournalBMJ Oncology
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2023

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgments:
The BladderPath Study was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, project number 14/08/60. We thank the patients, investigators and research staff members at participating sites who took part in the BladderPath study. We also thank Ms Eleanor Watson for her assistance with the referencing.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Boosting and broadening recruitment to UK cancer trials: towards a blueprint for action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this