The impact of mandatory waiting periods on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence

Fiona de Londras, Amanda Cleeve, Maria Rodriguez, Alana Farrell, Magdalena Furgalska , Antonella Lavelanet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This review follows an established methodology for integrating human rights to address knowledge gaps related to the health and non-health outcomes of mandatory waiting periods (MWPs) for access to abortion. MWP is a requirement imposed by law, policy, or practice, to wait a specified amount of time between requesting and receiving abortion care. Recognizing that recognized that MWPs “demean[] women as competent decision-makers”, the World Health Organization recommends against MWPs. International human rights bodies have similarly encouraged states to repeal and not to introduce MWPs, which they recognize as operating as barriers to accessing sexual and reproductive healthcare. This review of 34 studies published between 2010 and 2021, together with international human rights law, establishes the health and non-health harms of MWPs for people seeking abortion, including delayed abortion, opportunity costs, and disproportionate impact. Impacts of abortion providers include increased workloads and system costs.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1232
Number of pages13
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume22
Issue number1
Early online date21 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • abortion
  • abortion law
  • abortion regulation
  • human rights
  • reproductive rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General
  • Law
  • Reproductive Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of mandatory waiting periods on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this