Social media, sentiment and public opinions: evidence from #Brexit and #USElection

Yuriy Gorodnichenko, Tho Pham, Oleksandr Talavera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper studies information diffusion in social media and the potential role of bots in influencing public opinions. Using Twitter data on the 2016 E.U. Referendum (“Brexit”) and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, we find that diffusion of information on Twitter is largely complete within 1–2 h. Stronger diffusion between agents with similar beliefs is consistent with the “echo chambers” view of social media. Our results are consistent the notion that bots could have a tangible effect on the tweeting activity of humans and that the degree of bots’ influence depends on whether bots provide information consistent with humans’ priors. Overall, our results suggest that the aggressive use of Twitter bots, coupled with the fragmentation of social media and the role of sentiment, could enhance political polarization.
Original languageEnglish
Article number103772
Number of pages22
JournalEuropean Economic Review
Volume136
Early online date24 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Brexit
  • Echo chambers
  • Information diffusion
  • Political Bots
  • Twitter
  • U.S. Election

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social media, sentiment and public opinions: evidence from #Brexit and #USElection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this