Life cycle assessment of a barge-type floating wind turbine and comparison with other types of wind turbines

Nurullah Yildiz, Hassan Hemida*, Charalampos Baniotopoulos

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

130 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The intensive increase of global warming every year affects our world negatively and severely. The use of renewable energy sources has gained importance in reducing and eliminating the effect of global warming. To this end, new technologies are being developed to facilitate the use of these resources. One of these technological developments is the floating wind turbine. In order to evaluate the respective environmental footprint of these systems, a life cycle assessment (LCA) is herein applied. In this study, the environmental impact of floating wind turbines is investigated using a life cycle assessment approach and the results are compared with the respective ones of onshore and jacket offshore wind turbines of the same power capacity. The studied floating wind turbine has a square foundation that is open at its centre and is connected to the seabed with a synthetic fibre-nylon anchorage system. The environmental impact of all life cycles of such a structure, i.e., the manufacture, the operation, the disposal, and the recycling stages of the wind turbines, has been evaluated. For these floating wind turbines, it has been found that the greatest environmental impact corresponds to the manufacturing stage, whilst the global warming potential and the energy payback time of a 2 MW floating wind turbine of a barge-type platform is higher than that of the onshore, the jacket offshore (2 MW) and the floating (5 MW) wind turbines on a sway floating platform.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5656
JournalEnergies
Volume14
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Sept 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of National Education of Turkey for the financial support of his research activity. Valuable discussions with Michaela Gkantou, Liverpool John Moores University are also acknowledged with thanks. The third author would also like to acknowledge with thank Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung’s continuous support to his research work.

Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of National Education of Turkey for the financial support of his research activity. Valuable discussions with Michaela Gkantou, Liverpool John Moores University are also acknowledged with thanks. The third author would also like to acknowledge with thank Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung?s continuous support to his research work.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

  • Abiotic depletion potential for fossil fuels (ADPF)
  • Acidification potential (AP)
  • Floating wind turbine
  • Global warming potential (GWP)
  • Life cycle assessment (LCA)
  • Offshore wind turbine
  • Renewable energy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Fuel Technology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Energy (miscellaneous)
  • Control and Optimization
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Life cycle assessment of a barge-type floating wind turbine and comparison with other types of wind turbines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this