The people’s critical linguistics: using archival data to investigate responses to linguistic informalisation

Joe Spencer-Bennett*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

394 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Arguments about the sociopolitical significance of the informalisation of English have been central to the critical study of language in society since the 1980s. This article demonstrates that informalisation was also a key concern of ordinary users of British English in the 1980s. Correspondents in the British Mass Observation Project articulated judgements of informalisation that were in many ways continuous with those of academic linguists. The article argues that such critical arguments about language were part of a ‘structure of feeling’ (Raymond Williams) of late twentieth-century Britain. This suggests a rethinking of ordinary language users’ relations to their linguistic experience, not as unthinkingly ‘prescriptivist’, nor as merely ‘commonsensical’, but as exhibiting a nuance which academic linguists would do well to engage with more fully. The article makes the case for the use of social-historical archives in investigations of metalanguage, as a means by which the social significance of language can be better understood. (Critical linguistics, folk linguistics, terms of address, informalisation, synthetic personalisation, prescriptivism)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-304
Number of pages22
JournalLanguage in Society
Volume50
Issue number2
Early online date5 May 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The people’s critical linguistics: using archival data to investigate responses to linguistic informalisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this