Literal or metaphorical? Conventional or creative? Contested metaphoricity in intense emotional experiences

Sarah Turner*, Jeannette Littlemore

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Metaphor has long been considered a ‘way in’ to people’s experiences, with metaphor analysis being used to gain insights into a range of psychological and physiological phenomena. However, a number of challenges arise when analysing metaphor in such contexts. We reflect on the challenges we have encountered in our research into intensely emotional and/or personal experiences related to bereavement and religious belief. Both areas showcase metaphor operating in the ‘liminal spaces’ of human experience. The spaces between life and death, personhood and non-personhood, and belief and non-belief prove rich ground for metaphor, but the qualities of these metaphors are as complex and elusive as the concepts they are being used to describe.

We explore how metaphoricity in general, and creative use of metaphor in particular, in these contexts are flexible phenomena, opening up new questions as to what ‘counts’ as a (creative) metaphor. We propose three levels at which people use or experience metaphor, show how these interact, and propose a number of methodological factors to be taken into consideration when conducting metaphor research in such complex areas of human experience.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-58
Number of pages22
JournalMetaphor and the Social World
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • metaphor
  • metaphor identification
  • metaphoricity
  • emotion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Literal or metaphorical? Conventional or creative? Contested metaphoricity in intense emotional experiences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this