Survival rate and complication-free survival rate of implant-retained prostheses in the oral rehabilitation of patients with head and neck cancer: a retrospective evaluation of a cohort from a regional service

Dominic P Laverty, Owen Addison, Praveen Sharma, David Newsum, Geoffrey Bateman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Statement of problem: Literature reporting on the prosthetic survival and complications of implant-retained prostheses in patients with head and neck cancer is sparse.

Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to present the survival rates and complication-free survival rates of both fixed and removable implant-retained oral prostheses in patients with head and neck cancer while also reporting on the frequency and causes of failure and complications for each prosthesis type.

Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of the prosthetic survival rates and complication-free survival rates of implant-retained oral prostheses and the frequency and causes of failure and complications in patients with head and neck cancer treated in a regional unit from 2012 to 2017 was performed. Differences in categorical and continuous data were assessed for statistical significance by using the Pearson chi-square test, Fisher exact test, t test, and analysis of variance as appropriate. Cox proportional hazard regression models were fitted to evaluate the association between prostheses type, clinical and medical factors, and the outcomes of survival and complication-free survival. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the frequency and type of prosthetic complications.

Results: The sample was composed of 153 patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer who had completed implant-retained prosthodontic rehabilitation and had been provided with 221 prostheses. The 5-year survival rate was 87% for maxillary fixed prostheses, 79% for mandibular fixed, 66% for maxillary removable, and 50% for mandibular removable. Hazard ratios were calculated showing that the 5-year survival rate of a mandibular removable prosthesis (HR=5.1; 95% CI 1.60-16.25) (P=.006) was greater than that of a maxillary fixed prosthesis (HR=1.0). The 5-year complication-free survival rate was highest for mandibular fixed prostheses (62%), followed by maxillary fixed (58%), maxillary removable (36%), and mandibular removable prostheses (29%). Hazard ratios showed that the 5-year survival rate of maxillary removable (HR=1.91; 95% CI 1.01-3.66) (P=.048) and mandibular removable prosthesis (HR=2.29; 95% CI 1.23-4.25) (P=.009) was greater than that of a maxillary fixed prosthesis (HR=1.0). Variables of radiotherapy, grafting, age, and sex and their influence on the survival rate and complication-free survival rate were assessed but were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: This evaluation indicated that fixed implant-retained prostheses had a higher 5-year survival rate and 5-year complication-free survival rate than removable implant-retained prostheses in patients with head and neck cancer.
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Early online date3 Aug 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Aug 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Survival rate and complication-free survival rate of implant-retained prostheses in the oral rehabilitation of patients with head and neck cancer: a retrospective evaluation of a cohort from a regional service'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this