Abstract
The 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence in New Zealand exposed loess-mantled slopes in the area to very high levels of seismic excitation (locally measured as >2 g). Few loess slopes showed permanent local downslope deformation, and most of these showed only limited accumulated displacement. A series of innovative dynamic back-pressured shear box tests were undertaken on intact and remoulded loess samples collected from one of the recently active slopes replicating field conditions under different simplified horizontal seismic excitations. During each test, the strength reduction and excess pore water pressures generated were measured as the sample failed. Test results suggest that although dynamic liquefaction could have occurred, a key factor was likely to have been that the loess was largely unsaturated at the times of the large earthquake events. The failure of intact loess samples in the tests was complex and variable due to the highly variable geotechnical characteristics of the material. Some loess samples failed rapidly as a result of dynamic liquefaction as seismic excitation generated an increase in pore water pressure, triggering rapid loss of strength and, thus, of shear resistance. Following initial failure, pore pressure dissipated with continued seismic excitation and the sample consolidated, resulting in partial shear strength recovery. Once excess pore water pressures had dissipated, deformation continued in a critical effective stress state with no further change in volume. Remoulded and weaker samples, however, did not liquefy and instead immediately reduced in volume with an accompanying slower and more sustained increase in pore pressure as the sample consolidated. Thereafter, excess pressures dissipated and deformation continued at a critical state. The complex behaviour explained why, despite exceptionally strong ground shaking, there was only limited displacement and lack of run-out: dynamic liquefaction was unlikely to occur in the freely draining slopes. Dynamic liquefaction, however, remained a plausible mechanism to explain loess failure in some of the low-angle toe slopes, where a permanent water table was present in the loess.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 789-804 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Landslides |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The authors thank Chris Massey and Mark Yetton for information and advice. Christchurch City Council facilitated site access and provided data from boreholes and mapping studies. Zane Bruce and Mark Yetton assisted in the field sampling. Stuart Read and Peter Barker are thanked for their support during the laboratory testing and analysis phase which was undertaken within the GNS Rock and Soil Mechanics Laboratory. We also thank our GNS Science colleagues Will Ries and Darren D'Cruz who prepared the figures and Phil Glassey for his constructive review of an earlier draft of this manuscript. The research has in part been supported by the GNS Science Strategic Development Fund, the GNS Direct Crown Funded Landslide Hazards Programme and by the NERC/ESRC Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards Programme under the Earthquakes Without Frontiers project, grant reference NE/J01995X/1 and NERC/Newton Fund grant NE/N000315.
Funding Information:
The authors thank Chris Massey and Mark Yetton for information and advice. Christchurch City Council facilitated site access and provided data from boreholes and mapping studies. Zane Bruce and Mark Yetton assisted in the field sampling. Stuart Read and Peter Barker are thanked for their support during the laboratory testing and analysis phase which was undertaken within the GNS Rock and Soil Mechanics Laboratory. We also thank our GNS Science colleagues Will Ries and Darren D’Cruz who prepared the figures and Phil Glassey for his constructive review of an earlier draft of this manuscript. The research has in part been supported by the GNS Science Strategic Development Fund, the GNS Direct Crown Funded Landslide Hazards Programme and by the NERC/ESRC Increasing Resilience to Natural Hazards Programme under the Earthquakes Without Frontiers project, grant reference NE/J01995X/1 and NERC/Newton Fund grant NE/N000315.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Keywords
- Back pressure shear box
- Canterbury earthquake sequence
- Dynamic liquefaction
- Loess landslide
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology