Unwinding retrogression: examining the practice of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
304 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The doctrine of non-retrogression used by the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is apt for the current moment of crisis and withdrawal from human rights standards. It addresses instances where the State is responsible for backwards steps in human rights protection. However, the doctrine has rarely been used by the Committee as it is paralysed within conceptual confusion and practical ambiguity. This article unravels those difficulties and highlights ways forward. It gives a brief history of non-retrogression and identifies what backwardness the doctrine seeks to regulate, which actions and inactions of the State it defines as culpable, how the multiple steps of the doctrine are to be proved and where the doctrine fits within the Committee’s processes of scrutiny. Overall, it is argued that the significant potential of the doctrine is constrained by its confusions and that urgent reforms are needed to ensure its use and effectiveness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1–24
Number of pages24
JournalHuman Rights Law Review
Early online date15 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Nov 2019

Keywords

  • Human rights
  • Doctrine of non-retrogression
  • International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
  • Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unwinding retrogression: examining the practice of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this