Beware ‘persuasive communication devices’ when writing and reading scientific articles

Olivier Corneille*, Jo Havemann, Emma L Henderson, Hans IJzerman, Ian Hussey, Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry, Lee Jussim, Nicholas P Holmes, Artur Pilacinski, Brice Beffara, Harriet Carroll, Nicholas Otieno Outa, Peter Lush, Leon D Lotter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Authors rely on a range of devices and techniques to attract and maintain the interest of readers, and to convince them of the merits of the author’s point of view. However, when writing a scientific article, authors must use these ‘persuasive communication devices’ carefully. In particular, they must be explicit about the limitations of their work, avoid obfuscation, and resist the temptation to oversell their results. Here we discuss a list of persuasive communication devices and we encourage authors, as well as reviewers and editors, to think carefully about their use.
Original languageEnglish
Article number:e88654
Number of pages6
JournaleLife
Volume12
Early online date25 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 May 2023

Keywords

  • language
  • scientific publishing
  • Human
  • scientific writing
  • reporting
  • citation
  • point of view

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beware ‘persuasive communication devices’ when writing and reading scientific articles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this