Comparison of landslide inventories from the 1994 Mw 6.8 Arthurs Pass and 2015 Mw 6.0 Wilberforce earthquakes, Canterbury, New Zealand

Brenda Jane Rosser*, Jonathan M. Carey

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 6th January 2015 Mw 6.0 Wilberforce earthquake, 30 km west of Arthurs Pass in the Upper Wilberforce catchment, produced ground shaking of at least 0.22 g, just above the expected threshold for landslide initiation based on previous work. An aerial reconnaissance confirmed that at least 200 landslides occurred within an area of 370 km2. The majority of failures were of moderate volume and occurred on slopes of between 22° and 67°. Approximately 85% of failures occurred within 12 km2 of the earthquake epicentre, although large landslides also occurred outside of this area, at sites where previous landslides had occurred. We compared this inventory with one obtained by a similar method in similar terrain after a Mw 6.8 earthquake in 1994, 20 km southwest of Arthurs Pass. Whilst the 1994 earthquake included a higher proportion of landslides with larger volumes close to the earthquake epicentre, the number of landslides and area that they affected was greater during the Wilberforce earthquake. In addition, the Wilberforce earthquake triggered its second largest landslide at a substantial distance (25 km) from the epicentre, in an area of moderate shaking. This landslide temporarily dammed Arahura River, causing the greatest potential geo-hazard risk of the earthquake event. The results indicate that whilst the sizes of landslides that may initiate in an earthquake generally increase with increasing earthquake magnitude, failure does not require the exceedance of a specific earthquake magnitude threshold. We suggest that landslide initiation is equally dependent on: (1) the susceptibility to failure of the terrain at the time of the earthquake and 2) the specific ground-shaking intensity (MM) experienced. These two factors should be important considerations when planning emergency responses and post-earthquake aerial reconnaissance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1171-1180
Number of pages10
JournalLandslides
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank GNS Science colleagues Nick Horspool for the analysis and preparation of ground-shaking intensity maps immediately after the event and Susan Ellis for her assistance in the field. They also thank their colleagues Mauri McSaveney and Dougal Townsend for constructive reviews of earlier drafts of this manuscript. Aerial reconnaissance following the earthquake was funded by GeoNet and the manuscript was prepared with funding from the GNS Direct Crown funded Landslide Hazards Programme.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Keywords

  • 1994 Arthur’s Pass earthquake
  • 2005 Wilberforce earthquake
  • Co-siesmic landsliding
  • Earthquake-induced landslides
  • Landslide inventory
  • Landslide reconnaissance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of landslide inventories from the 1994 Mw 6.8 Arthurs Pass and 2015 Mw 6.0 Wilberforce earthquakes, Canterbury, New Zealand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this