Creoles of the mountains: race, regionalism, and modernity in progressive era Appalachia

Michell Chresfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

348 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article investigates how Progressive Era writers, both popular and scientific, helped to construct multiracial identities alongside competing efforts to enshrine race into strictly black and white terms. Existing scholarship on race in the Progressive Era has not sufficiently analyzed the presence of multiracial populations. Instead, scholars have treated state and federal efforts to police racial boundaries, namely through anti-miscegenation laws and the census, as evidence that multiracial persons were a legal impossibility. However, scientific and popular writing on Appalachia provides a conceptual space in which multiracialism was not only a conceptual possibility, but was engendered. Appalachia took on increased importance during the Progressive Era as both intellectuals and reformers used the region to frame their anxieties about the limits of modernity and the threat of racial mixing. The region was home to white mountaineers who appeared arrested in time, existing in uncomfortable proximity to newly discovered groups with white, black, and Native American ancestry who also seemed to have been shunned by civilization. In attempting to understand the peculiar conditions of Appalachia, these Progressive Era writers helped to advance some of the first ideas about what it meant to be mixed-race in America.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era
Early online date15 Sept 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Sept 2020

Keywords

  • Appalachia
  • eugenics
  • Jackson Whites
  • modernity
  • multiracial
  • Native American
  • race-mixture
  • racial construction
  • scientific racism
  • triracial isolate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Creoles of the mountains: race, regionalism, and modernity in progressive era Appalachia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this