Restrictive interventions: understanding and reducing their use in mental health settings

Nutmeg Hallett*, Paul McLaughlin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Restrictive interventions, which include enhanced observations, seclusion and restraint, are associated with significant and far-reaching harm for patients, staff and those who witness their use. They should only ever be used as the last resort. However, mental health professionals often encounter patient behaviours that challenge, which can include violence, which may prompt them to use restrictive interventions. The primary prevention of patient behaviours that challenge is crucial to reduce the need for restrictive interventions in mental health settings.

This article discusses the different types of restrictive interventions and describes some strategies that can support reduction of their use in mental health settings. The authors also consider some of the legal and ethical aspects of restrictive interventions and identify the importance of adopting a trauma-informed approach to care.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1620
JournalMental Health Practice
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Aug 2022

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Control and restraint
  • Ethical issues
  • Human rights
  • patient safety
  • Professional
  • Seclusion
  • Mental Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Restrictive interventions: understanding and reducing their use in mental health settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this