TY - JOUR
T1 - Author Functions and Freedom
T2 - “Michel Foucault” and “Ayn Rand” in the Anglophone “Culture Wars”
AU - Downing, Lisa
PY - 2023/11/30
Y1 - 2023/11/30
N2 - Freedom was a core theme of Michel Foucault’s later writings, as well the central tenet of the work of pro-capitalist writer Ayn Rand. This article demonstrates strikingly similar arguments made in the œuvres of these unlikely bedfellows regarding how care for the self/ holding the self as one’s highest value (in Foucault’s and Rand’s respective lexicons) can lead to an ethic of freedom. This article has the dual aims of, firstly, placing Rand into dialogue with Foucault to reveal their surprising closeness on the crucial question of individual freedom, and, secondly, examining the ways in which both author names have recently been deployed in political discourse to stand in for caricatured versions of the “freedoms” of right-wing greed and left-wing moral relativism, respectively, in the so-called “culture wars” of the 2020s. Foucault, in fact, is doubly slurred since, as well as becoming a metonym for the perceived dangers of identity politics in universities, according to UK cabinet minister Liz Truss, his ambivalent and ambiguous relationship with neoliberalism and individualism proves a problem to many scholars who wish to fit him squarely into a left-wing continental canon. Tracing the contiguity between Rand’s and Foucault’s versions of freedom offers a warning against simplistic retroactive readings that sacrifice critical nuance for a tribal politics of purity.
AB - Freedom was a core theme of Michel Foucault’s later writings, as well the central tenet of the work of pro-capitalist writer Ayn Rand. This article demonstrates strikingly similar arguments made in the œuvres of these unlikely bedfellows regarding how care for the self/ holding the self as one’s highest value (in Foucault’s and Rand’s respective lexicons) can lead to an ethic of freedom. This article has the dual aims of, firstly, placing Rand into dialogue with Foucault to reveal their surprising closeness on the crucial question of individual freedom, and, secondly, examining the ways in which both author names have recently been deployed in political discourse to stand in for caricatured versions of the “freedoms” of right-wing greed and left-wing moral relativism, respectively, in the so-called “culture wars” of the 2020s. Foucault, in fact, is doubly slurred since, as well as becoming a metonym for the perceived dangers of identity politics in universities, according to UK cabinet minister Liz Truss, his ambivalent and ambiguous relationship with neoliberalism and individualism proves a problem to many scholars who wish to fit him squarely into a left-wing continental canon. Tracing the contiguity between Rand’s and Foucault’s versions of freedom offers a warning against simplistic retroactive readings that sacrifice critical nuance for a tribal politics of purity.
KW - Michel Foucault
KW - Ayn Rand
KW - author functions
KW - neoliberalism
KW - culture wars
U2 - 10.3366/para.2023.0439
DO - 10.3366/para.2023.0439
M3 - Article
SN - 0264-8334
VL - 46
SP - 301
EP - 316
JO - Paragraph
JF - Paragraph
IS - 3
ER -