Measures of individual differences in adult theory of mind: A systematic review

Kit Yeung*, Ian Apperly, R.T. Devine

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Theory of mind (ToM), the ability to understand and reason about mental states, has been extensively studied in young children and clinical populations. A growing interest in examining ToM in adults has emerged over the past two decades, but the extent to which existing measures are suitable for studying adults, especially in detecting individual differences, remains understudied. In this systematic review of 273 studies, 75 measures used to investigate individual differences in adults' ToM were identified. Their sensitivity to individual differences, reliability, and validity were examined. Results suggest that ceiling effects were prevalent, and there was limited evidence to establish the reliability or validity of these measures due to the lack of reports of psychometric properties. Interrelations among measures were inconsistent. These findings highlight the need for future empirical and theoretical work to broaden the evidence base regarding psychometric properties of measures, to develop new measures, and to lay out more specific hypotheses about the relevance of ToM for different social outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number105481
JournalNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
Volume157
Early online date28 Nov 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2024

Keywords

  • theory of mind
  • adults
  • cognition
  • psychometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measures of individual differences in adult theory of mind: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this