The FAST‐M complex intervention for the detection and management of maternal sepsis in low‐resource settings: a multi‐site evaluation

James Cheshire, Laura Jones, Laura Munthali, Christopher Kamphinga, Harry Liyaya, Tarcizius Phiri, William Parry‐Smith, Catherine Dunlop, Charles Makwenda, Adam James Devall, Aurelio Tobias, Bejoy Nambiar, Abi Merriel, Helen Williams, Ioannis Gallos, Amie Wilson, Arri Coomarasamy, David Lissauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

164 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether the implementation of the FAST-M complex intervention was feasible and improved the recognition and management of maternal sepsis in a low-resource setting. Design: A before-and-after design. Setting: Fifteen government healthcare facilities in Malawi. Population: Women suspected of having maternal sepsis. Methods: The FAST-M complex intervention consisted of the following components: the FAST-M maternal sepsis treatment bundle and the FAST-M implementation programme. Performance of selected process outcomes was compared between a 2-month baseline phase and 6-month intervention phase with compliance used as a proxy measure of feasibility. Main outcome result: Compliance with vital sign recording and use of the FAST-M maternal sepsis bundle. Results: Following implementation of the FAST-M intervention, women were more likely to have a complete set of vital signs taken on admission to the wards (0/163 [0%] versus 169/252 [67.1%], P < 0.001). Recognition of suspected maternal sepsis improved with more cases identified following the intervention (12/106 [11.3%] versus 107/166 [64.5%], P < 0.001). Sepsis management improved, with women more likely to receive all components of the FAST-M treatment bundle within 1 hour of recognition (0/12 [0%] versus 21/107 [19.6%], P = 0.091). In particular, women were more likely to receive antibiotics (3/12 [25.0%] versus 72/107 [67.3%], P = 0.004) within 1 hour of recognition of suspected sepsis. Conclusion: Implementation of the FAST-M complex intervention was feasible and led to the improved recognition and management of suspected maternal sepsis in a low-resource setting such as Malawi. Tweetable Abstract: Implementation of a sepsis care bundle for low-resources improved recognition & management of maternal sepsis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1324-1333
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume128
Issue number8
Early online date4 Feb 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Feb 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Research funding was provided by MSD for Mothers, University of Birmingham and the charity Ammalife. Funds from MSD were provided through its MSD for Mothers programme. MSD for Mothers is an initiative of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, N J, USA. DL, AC, JC, AW and CD all work as volunteers with the charity Ammalife. Those engaged in the work were excluded from the funding decision made by Ammalife. None of the funders had input into the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report.

Keywords

  • Care bundle
  • complex intervention
  • feasibility study
  • low-resource setting
  • maternal sepsis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The FAST‐M complex intervention for the detection and management of maternal sepsis in low‐resource settings: a multi‐site evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this