A Comparative Study of High Temperature Tensile and Creep Testing Between Standard and Miniature Specimens: Applicability and Limits

Yuanbo T. Tang*, Caspar Schwalbe, Magdalena Futoma, Bryan Roebuck, Satoshi Utada, Roger C. Reed

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study concerns the quasi-static and time-dependent mechanical behavior obtained via the miniaturized electro-thermal mechanical testing (ETMT) approach for single crystal (SX) and conventional cast Mar-M-247 superalloy. The experimental outcome was benchmarked against standardized testing procedures. It is found that tensile yielding behavior can be captured accurately by the ETMT approach up to 1100 ºC, provided the appropriate type of thermocouple (T/C) is chosen. Furthermore, creep rupture behavior is underestimated by the miniaturized set-up. High repeatability of the rupture time was obtained for the SX case, whereas a significant scatter was observed for the conventional cast case. The discrepancies are assessed in detail; discussion centers around analytical and practical considerations, such as temperature uncertainty due to parasitic voltage and the choice of T/C, microstructural change as a result of the Joule heating, representative gauge volume, and strain rate non-linearity. Consequently, the applicability and limits of the miniaturized approach are examined critically, and improvements were suggested where appropriate.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1568–1581
Number of pages14
JournalMetallurgical and Materials Transactions A
Volume54
Early online date5 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2023

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgments:
The authors acknowledge provision of material and funding from MTU Aero Engines AG Germany. YTT and SU would like to thank Andrew Pearce from Instron for technical advice.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparative Study of High Temperature Tensile and Creep Testing Between Standard and Miniature Specimens: Applicability and Limits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this