Abstract
Some reasons are thought to depend on relations between people, such as that of a promiser to a promisee. It has sometimes been assumed that all reasons that are relational in this way are moral obligations. I argue, via a counter example, that there are non-obligatory relational reasons. If true, this has ramifications for relational theories of morality.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 238-246 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Analysis |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 4 Mar 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2022 |