Use of the made affirmative procedure in Scotland: reflections from the pandemic

Fiona de Londras; Pablo Grez; Daniella Lock

doi:10.3366/elr.2022.0761

Use of the made affirmative procedure in Scotland: reflections from the pandemic

Fiona de Londras, Pablo Grez, Daniella Lock

Birmingham Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	219-227
Number of pages	9
Journal	Edinburgh Law Review
Volume	26
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2022.0761
Publication status	Published - 11 May 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
☼ University of Strathclyde ☼☼University of Birmingham This article is a product of the COVID-19 Review Observatory funded by the AHRC through the UKRI Covid-19 Agile Call (2019-22). 1 R Fox and J Blackwell, The Devil is in the Detail: Parliament and Delegated Legislation (2014); R Fox, J Blackwell and B Fowler, Taking Back Control for Brexit and Beyond (2017). See also the Hansard Society’s recently-launched Delegated Legislation Review available at: https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/projects/delegated-legislation-review. 2 Select Committee on the Constitution, The Legislative Process: The Delegation of Powers (HL 2017–19, 225); Select Committee on the Constitution, COVID-19 and the use and scrutiny of emergency power (HL 2021–22, 15). 3 J King, “The Province of Delegated Legislation” in E Fisher, J King and A Young (eds), The Foundations and Future of Public Law: Essays in Honour of Paul Craig (2020); A Tucker, “Parliamentary Scrutiny

Access to Document

10.3366/elr.2022.0761

deLondras2022Useoft
This is the accepted manuscript for a forthcoming publication in Edinburgh Law Review. The final version of record will be available at: http://www.euppublishing.com/journal/elr
Accepted author manuscript, 626 KBLicence: None: All rights reserved

https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/full/10.3366/elr.2022.0761

3 Article

Delegated Legislation in the Pandemic: Further Limits of a Constitutional Bargain Revealed
Lock, D., de Londras, F. & Grez, P., 5 Oct 2023, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Legal Studies.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
File
26 Downloads (Pure)
Parliament, the pandemic, and constitutional principle in the United Kingdom: a study of the Coronavirus Act 2020
Grez Hidalgo, P., de Londras, F. & Lock, D., 11 Jul 2022, In: Modern Law Review.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
Rights and parliamentary oversight in the pandemic: reflections from the Scottish Parliament
de Londras, F., Grez Hidalgo, P. & Lock, D., 2022, In: Public Law. p. 582 615 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
File

1 Finished

Pandemic Review: Rights and Accountability in COVID-19
de Londras, F.
Arts and Humanities Research Council
3/11/20 → 2/05/22
Project: Research

Cite this

@article{3dc27afd6d864df7a662506bf622d3cd,

title = "Use of the made affirmative procedure in Scotland: reflections from the pandemic",

author = "{de Londras}, Fiona and Pablo Grez and Daniella Lock",

note = "Funding Information: ☼ University of Strathclyde ☼☼University of Birmingham This article is a product of the COVID-19 Review Observatory funded by the AHRC through the UKRI Covid-19 Agile Call (2019-22). 1 R Fox and J Blackwell, The Devil is in the Detail: Parliament and Delegated Legislation (2014); R Fox, J Blackwell and B Fowler, Taking Back Control for Brexit and Beyond (2017). See also the Hansard Society{\textquoteright}s recently-launched Delegated Legislation Review available at: https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/projects/delegated-legislation-review. 2 Select Committee on the Constitution, The Legislative Process: The Delegation of Powers (HL 2017–19, 225); Select Committee on the Constitution, COVID-19 and the use and scrutiny of emergency power (HL 2021–22, 15). 3 J King, “The Province of Delegated Legislation” in E Fisher, J King and A Young (eds), The Foundations and Future of Public Law: Essays in Honour of Paul Craig (2020); A Tucker, “Parliamentary Scrutiny",

year = "2022",

month = may,

day = "11",

doi = "10.3366/elr.2022.0761",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "219--227",

journal = "Edinburgh Law Review",

issn = "1364-9809",

publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of the made affirmative procedure in Scotland

T2 - reflections from the pandemic

AU - de Londras, Fiona

AU - Grez, Pablo

AU - Lock, Daniella

N1 - Funding Information: ☼ University of Strathclyde ☼☼University of Birmingham This article is a product of the COVID-19 Review Observatory funded by the AHRC through the UKRI Covid-19 Agile Call (2019-22). 1 R Fox and J Blackwell, The Devil is in the Detail: Parliament and Delegated Legislation (2014); R Fox, J Blackwell and B Fowler, Taking Back Control for Brexit and Beyond (2017). See also the Hansard Society’s recently-launched Delegated Legislation Review available at: https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/projects/delegated-legislation-review. 2 Select Committee on the Constitution, The Legislative Process: The Delegation of Powers (HL 2017–19, 225); Select Committee on the Constitution, COVID-19 and the use and scrutiny of emergency power (HL 2021–22, 15). 3 J King, “The Province of Delegated Legislation” in E Fisher, J King and A Young (eds), The Foundations and Future of Public Law: Essays in Honour of Paul Craig (2020); A Tucker, “Parliamentary Scrutiny

PY - 2022/5/11

Y1 - 2022/5/11

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130609564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3366/elr.2022.0761

DO - 10.3366/elr.2022.0761

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 1364-9809

VL - 26

SP - 219

EP - 227

JO - Edinburgh Law Review

JF - Edinburgh Law Review

IS - 2

ER -

Use of the made affirmative procedure in Scotland: reflections from the pandemic

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Research output

Delegated Legislation in the Pandemic: Further Limits of a Constitutional Bargain Revealed

Parliament, the pandemic, and constitutional principle in the United Kingdom: a study of the Coronavirus Act 2020

Rights and parliamentary oversight in the pandemic: reflections from the Scottish Parliament

Projects

Pandemic Review: Rights and Accountability in COVID-19

Cite this