The costs of surgical site infection after abdominal surgery in middle income countries: Key resource use In Wound Infection (KIWI) study

Mark Monahan*, James Glasbey, Tracy Roberts, Sue Jowett, Thomas Pinkney, Aneel Bhangu, Dion Morton, Antonio Ramos De la Medina, Dhruv Ghosh, Adesoji O. Ademuyiwa, Faustin Ntirenganya, Stephen Tabiri

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common complication of abdominal surgery, with substantial costs to patients and health systems. Heterogeneity in costing methods in existing SSI studies makes multi-country comparison challenging. The objective of the study was to assess the costs of SSI across middle-income countries. Methods Centres from a randomised controlled trial assessing interventions to reduce SSI (FALCON, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03700749NCT) were sampled from two upper-middle (India, Mexico) and two lower-middle (Ghana, Nigeria) income countries. The Key resource use In Wound Infection (KIWI) study collected data on postoperative resource use and costs from consecutive patients undergoing abdominal surgery with an incision >5cm (including caesarean section) that were recruited to FALCON between April and October 2020. The overall costs faced by patients with and without SSI were compared by operative field contamination (clean-contaminated versus contaminated-dirty), country and timing (inpatient versus outpatient). Findings 335 patients were included in KIWI; SSI occurred in 7% of clean-contaminated cases and 27% of contaminated-dirty cases. Overall, SSI was associated with an increase in postoperative healthcare costs by 75.3% (€412 international euros) after clean-contaminated surgery and 66.6% (€331) after contaminated-dirty surgery. The highest and lowest cost increases was in India for clean-contaminated cases (€517) and contaminated-dirty cases (€223), respectively. Overall, inpatient costs accounted for 96.4% of the total healthcare costs after clean-contaminated surgery and 92.5% after contaminated-dirty surgery. Conclusion SSI was associated with substantial additional postoperative costs across a range of settings. Investment in health technologies to reduce SSI may mitigate the financial burden to patients and low-resource health systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-44
JournalThe Journal of hospital infection
Volume136
Early online date21 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Healthcare costs
  • Global South
  • Wound infection
  • Postoperative complication
  • Hospital acquired infections
  • Patient Outcomes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The costs of surgical site infection after abdominal surgery in middle income countries: Key resource use In Wound Infection (KIWI) study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this