Abstract
Background: Traumatic injury elicits a hyperinflammatory response and remodelling of the immune system leading to immuneparesis. This study aimed to evaluate whether traumatic injury results in a state of prematurely aged immune phenotype to relate this to clinical outcomes and a greater risk of developing additional morbidities post-injury.
Methods and findings: Blood samples were collected from 57 critically injured patients with a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 26 (range 15–75 years), mean age of 39.67 years (range 20–84 years), and 80.7% males, at days 3, 14, 28 and 60 post-hospital admission. 55 healthy controls (HC), mean age 40.57 years (range 20–85 years), 89.7% males were also recruited. The phenotype and frequency of adaptive immune cells were used to calculate the IMM-AGE score, an indicator of the degree of phenotypic ageing of the immune system. IMM-AGE was elevated in trauma patients at an early timepoint (day 3) in comparison with healthy controls (p < 0.001), driven by an increase in senescent CD8 T cells (p < 0.0001), memory CD8 T cells (p < 0.0001) and regulatory T cells (p <0.0001) and a reduction in naïve CD8 T cells (p < 0.001) and overall T cell lymphopenia (p < 0 .0001). These changes persisted to day 60. Furthermore, the IMM-AGE scores were significantly higher in trauma patients (mean score 0.72) that developed sepsis (p = 0.05) in comparison with those (mean score 0.61) that did not.
Conclusions: The profoundly altered peripheral adaptive immune compartment after critical injury can be used as a potential biomarker to identify individuals at a high risk of developing sepsis and this state of prematurely aged immune phenotype in biologically young individuals persists for up to two months post-hospitalisation, compromising the host immune response to infections. Reversing this aged immune system is likely to have a beneficial impact on short- and longer-term outcomes of trauma survivors.
Methods and findings: Blood samples were collected from 57 critically injured patients with a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 26 (range 15–75 years), mean age of 39.67 years (range 20–84 years), and 80.7% males, at days 3, 14, 28 and 60 post-hospital admission. 55 healthy controls (HC), mean age 40.57 years (range 20–85 years), 89.7% males were also recruited. The phenotype and frequency of adaptive immune cells were used to calculate the IMM-AGE score, an indicator of the degree of phenotypic ageing of the immune system. IMM-AGE was elevated in trauma patients at an early timepoint (day 3) in comparison with healthy controls (p < 0.001), driven by an increase in senescent CD8 T cells (p < 0.0001), memory CD8 T cells (p < 0.0001) and regulatory T cells (p <0.0001) and a reduction in naïve CD8 T cells (p < 0.001) and overall T cell lymphopenia (p < 0 .0001). These changes persisted to day 60. Furthermore, the IMM-AGE scores were significantly higher in trauma patients (mean score 0.72) that developed sepsis (p = 0.05) in comparison with those (mean score 0.61) that did not.
Conclusions: The profoundly altered peripheral adaptive immune compartment after critical injury can be used as a potential biomarker to identify individuals at a high risk of developing sepsis and this state of prematurely aged immune phenotype in biologically young individuals persists for up to two months post-hospitalisation, compromising the host immune response to infections. Reversing this aged immune system is likely to have a beneficial impact on short- and longer-term outcomes of trauma survivors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 60 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Immunity & Ageing |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 5 Dec 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding:The SIR Study was part of the Surgeon General’s Casualty Nutrition Study (SGCNS), a Ministry of Defence-funded project. The analysis of the cohort was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre (SRMRC), Birmingham. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, the Medical Research Council or the Department of Health, UK. The funders provided financial support to this research but had no role in the design of the study, analysis, interpretations of the data and in writing the manuscript.
Keywords
- Traumatic injury
- Immunesenescence
- Sepsis
- Inflammation