The Draft Online Safety Bill and the regulation of hate speech: have we opened Pandora’s Box?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In thinking about the developing online harms regime (in the UK and elsewhere1) it is forgivable to think only of how laws placing responsibility on social media platforms to prevent hate speech may benefit society. Yet these laws could have insidious implications for free speech. By drawing on Germany’s Network Enforcement Act I investigate whether the increased prospect of liability, and the fines that may result from breaching the duty of care in the UK’s Online Safety Act - once it is in force - could result in platforms censoring more speech, but not necessarily hate speech, and using the imposed ‘responsibility’ as an excuse to censor speech that does not conform to their objectives. Thus, in drafting a Bill to protect the public from hate speech we may unintentionally open Pandora’s Box by giving platforms a statutory justification to take more ‘control of the message’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-75
JournalJournal of Media Law
Volume14
Issue number1
Early online date1 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Online Safety Bill
  • free speech
  • hate speech
  • online harms
  • online speech

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Draft Online Safety Bill and the regulation of hate speech: have we opened Pandora’s Box?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this