Abstract
Departing from the (post-)Anthropocenic crisis state of today’s world, fuelled by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, various post-truth populist follies, and an apocalyptic WW3-scenario that has been hanging in the air since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, this article argues for the possibility – and necessity – of an affirmative posthumanist-materialist mapping of hope. Embedded in the Deleuzoguattarian-Braidottian (see Deleuze and Guattari 2005 [1980]; Braidotti 2011 [1994]) methodology of critical cartography, and infused with critical posthumanist, new materialist, and queer theoretical perspectives, this cartography of hope is sketched out against two permacrisis-infused positionalities: nostalgic humanism and tragic (post)humanism. Forced to navigate between these two extremes, the critical cartography of hope presented here explores hope in numerous historico-philosophical (re)configurations: from the premodern “hope-as-all-too-human”, to a more politicised early modern “hope-as-(politically-)human” – representing hope’s first paradigm shift (politicisation), and from a four decades-long neoliberal redrawing of hope as “no-more-hope” – hope’s second shift (depoliticisation) – to a critical (new) materialist plea to de-anthropocentrise and re-politicise hope – hope’s third and final post-Anthropocenic shift (re-politicisation). By mapping these (re)configurations of hope, a philosophical plea is made for hope as a material(ist) praxis that can help us better understand – and counter – these extractive late capitalist, neoliberal more-than-human crisis times.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 385-412 |
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | CounterText |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2022 |
Keywords
- Critical cartography
- Critical (new) materialisms
- Critical posthumanist theory
- Crisis times
- Hope
- Nostalgic humanism
- (Post-)Anthropocene
- Tragic (post)humanism