Originally trained in modern European languages, literatures, and thought at the Universities of London and Oxford, I read for a DPhil from 1996-1999, under the supervision of the late Prof. Malcolm Bowie, on French literature and discourses of necrophilia. (This was published as Desiring the Dead: Necrophilia and Nineteenth-Century French Literature in 2003).  I have since worked at Queen Mary University of London and the University of Exeter, before taking up my Chair at the University of Birmingham in 2012.

In 2009, I was the recipient of a Philip Leverhulme Prize, awarded to “outstanding scholars under the age of 36 who have made a substantial contribution to their field of study and whose future contributions are held to be of correspondingly high promise”. This prize provided me with two years of funded research leave from Exeter from 2010-2012. During the two-year period of research leave, I completed a major monograph about the gendering and othering of the figure of the murderer from 1830 to the present day, The Subject of Murder: Gender, Exceptionality, and the Modern Killer, which appeared in March 2013 with the University of Chicago Press, and I worked on a co-authored book with Dr Iain Morland and Dr Nikki Sullivan about the work of the late sexologist John Money. The cheekily titled Fuckology: Critical Essays on John Money’s Diagnostic Concepts was published in 2015, also with Chicago UP. My section of the book explores Money’s contribution to the controversial perversion/ paraphilia diagnosis.

Most recently, I have written a book entitled Selfish Women. This book examines cultural narratives surrounding women who espouse or explore discourses of self-interest, self-regard, and selfishness. The book asks how revisiting the words and works of selfish women of modernity, including Rachilde, Ayn Rand, Margaret Thatcher, and Lionel Shriver, can assist us in understanding our fraught individual and collective identities in contemporary culture. Moreover, it examines whether women with politics that are contrary to the interests of the collective can teach us anything about the value of rethinking the role of the individual. 

All of my research is underpinned by a guiding interest in exploring cultural and historical understandings of, and reactions to, perceived (ab)normality, extremity, and exceptionality – whether these be found in the so-called sexual perversions/ paraphilias with which much of my earlier work was concerned; in those subjects who transgress the gendered expectations placed upon them, such as female murderers; or in the ‘selfish’, right-wing women who are the subject of my most recent book. This is also why the ideas of philosopher of ‘normative power’, Michel Foucault, has featured prominently as a theoretical constant in my work, in combination with an individualist feminist ethic which strives to see female subjects always as flawed, full human beings, beyond the straitjackets of gendered norms.

My current research projects include:

(1) ‘Against Affect’: This project explores the ways in which the so-called ‘affective turn’ within the academic humanities has coincided with a cultural shift in public discourse concerning reason, feeling, freedom of expression, and identity. I argue for a feelings-free, pro-rational feminist response to the ills of populism, identity politics-based factionalism, and anti-intellectualism. This project, funded by the Leverhulme Trust in 2021-22, has led to the production of a short, polemical manifesto that will appear with University of Nebraska Press in their ‘Provocations’ series in 2025/26.

(2) ‘Beyond Monsters, Moral Panics, and MAPs: Reasoning the Sex Offender’: This nascent project will bring together an interdisciplinary team to trace a critical genealogy of the medico-legal figure of ‘the sex offender’ in the UK and in comparative European contexts. It will lead to several outputs and impact activities, including a co-authored book. The book will argue that we should reject the cultural tendency to other paedophilic persons and offenders as monsters, and should instead pursue a rational understanding of those with paraphilic desires or a deep-seated grudge against women, such as the largely online community of men known as ‘Incels’, as the most expedient way to avoid offending behaviour. It will also examine how misogynistic and non-child-centric cultures, such as 1970s celebrity culture in Britain, can facilitate and normalize the behaviour of those who go on to offend, exemplified by Jimmy Savile. Cases such as these show that those who offend are not wholly divorced from the attitudes of the culture they live in, but extreme logical extensions of it – a fact it behoves us to acknowledge. A facet of this project, examining data found on incel online fora, has been funded by the University’s Institute for Global Innovation (PI: Dr Sophie King-Hill; CI: me) in 2023-24.

My inaugural lecture at the University of Birmingham took as its subject matter some aspects of my research project on ‘selfish women’ that culminated in my 2019 monograph of that title